CA NeWs Beta*

Search This Site

Friday, March 30, 2012

Clarification on Point of Taxation Rules




Circular No.154/5/ 2012 – ST
 
FNo 334/1/2012- TRU
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise and Customs
Tax Research Unit
Room No 146, North Block, New Delhi
Dated: 28th March 2012
To
Chief Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (All)
Chief Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (All)
Director General of Service Tax
Director General of Central Excise Intelligence
Director General of Audit
Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (All)
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (All)
Commissioner of Service Tax (All)
 
Madam/Sir,
 
Subject: - Clarification on Point of Taxation Rules - regarding.
      
1.             Notification No.4/2012 - Service Tax dated the 17th March 2012 has amended the Point of Taxation Rules 2011 w.e.f. 1st April 2012, inter- alia, amending Rule 7 which applied to individuals or proprietary firms or partnership firms providing taxable services referred to in sub-clauses (g), (p), (q), (s), (t), (u), (za) and  (zzzzm) of clause (105) of section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994. Rule 7 determined the point of taxation in such cases as the date of receipt of payment. The provisions have been amended both in the Point of Taxation Rules 2011 and the Service Tax Rules 1994 such that from 1st April 2012 the payment of tax shall be allowed to be deferred till the receipt of payment upto a value of Rs 50 lakhs of taxable services. The facility has been granted to all individuals and partnership firms, irrespective of the description of service, whose turnover of taxable services is fifty lakh rupees or less in the previous financial year.
 
2.            Representations have been received, in respect of the specified eight services, requesting clarification on determination of point of taxation in respect of invoices issued on or before 31st March 2012 where the payment has not been received before 1st April 2012.
 
3.            The issue has been examined. For invoices issued on or before 31st March 2012, the point of taxation shall continue to be governed by the Rule 7 as it stands till the said date. Thus in respect of invoices issued on or before 31st March 2012 the point of taxation shall be the date of payment.
 
4.            Trade Notice/Public Notice may be issued to the field formations accordingly.
 
5.            Please acknowledge the receipt of this circular. Hindi version to follow.
 
 
(Shobhit Jain)
OSD, TRU
Fax: 011-23092037

Five Ways To... Get Out of Stagnation at Work

Being underemployed can be a frustrating experience,considering someone is not given work or responsibility commensurate with qualification or experience.But there are ways to get around it,as Writankar Mukherjee suggests.

1 Identify the Reasons


Do some stock-taking on why you are not given work.Is it because the boss likes or trusts someone else Or,have you done something unacceptable Take responsibility rather than asking for it.If bosses see that you really want to work,there will be no dearth of assignments, says Jindal Steel and Power executive director Manish Kharbanda.

2 Upgrade your Skills


This may be the perfect time to enroll for that part-time professional course or go in for a distance-learning one.However,this applies only if you are underqualified.If someone is overqualified and underemployed,they can improve their communication and influencing skills by enrolling in a workshop or training, says Angel Broking senior VP (HR) Dhruv Desai.

3 Opt for Challenges


The best way to get noticed by the bosses is to opt for a transformational project within the company.Contributing to cross-functional projects is another good option,says Ikya Human Capital Solutions MD Ajit Isaac.This could be projects around quality enhancements or product development.It could be a fitting way to prove ones worth, he says.

4 Think before you Quit


A person who is underemployed can be desperate to make a switch.But it is always better to mend relationships in the current job,create a positive image and then look for a change.Otherwise,there are possibilities of a negative comment by the boss during reference checks.Any role or job has its own dimensions,at times not optimally exploited by the professional.One can try and take a re-look,and this can be more satisfying, says says ICICI Prudential Life Insurance HR head Judhajit Das.

5 Skip Online Games


The worst damage to your image could come from playing online games or being on Facebook the whole day.Spend your spare time getting to know about the company,reading about the industry and competitors.Build a relationship with other colleagues.Or do constructive jobs like working on CSR projects.

NEW RETURN FORMS FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13

  NEW RETURN FORMS FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 from incometaxindia.gov.in // MONARCH

NEW RETURN FORMS FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13
 
Form No.
 
 

Indian Individual Income tax Return
English
             Form 
 
           
 
 
Hindi
            Form
 
For Individuals and  HUFs not having Income from Business or Profession
English
            Form
 
            Instruction
 
Hindi
            Form
 
For Individuals/HUFs being partners in firms and not carrying out business or profession under any proprietorship]
English
            Form
 
            Instruction
 
Hindi
            Form
 
Sugam - Presumptive Business Income tax Return
English
            Form

        
 
 
Hindi
            Form
 
For individuals and HUFs having income from  a proprietory business or profession
English
            Form
 
            Instruction
 
Hindi
            Form
 
ITR-V
 
 
 
 
 
 

From :  Sunil Rajai

IT Offices Throughout India to Remain Open Tomorrow to Facilitate Filing of Returns

IT Offices Throughout India to Remain Open Tomorrow to Facilitate Filing of Returns
As the Financial Year 2011-12 closes on 31st March, 2012 falling on Saturday, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Ministry of Finance has issued an order directing all the Income Tax Offices throughout India to remain open on this day. The receipts counters will also work during normal office hours. The direction has been issued for administrative convenience by the CBDT in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961,

CBDT has also directed that special arrangements may also be made by way of opening additional receipt counters, wherever required on 30th and 31st March 2012 to facilitate the taxpayers in filing their returns of income conveniently.

SS/GN
(Release ID :82015)

Rs. 2481.39 crores Unclaimed Deposits with Banks

Ministry of Finance30-March, 2012 18:27 IST
Unclaimed Deposits with Banks
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has informed that as on 31st December, 2011, a total amount of around Rs. 2481.39 crores in 11249844 accounts is lying as unclsimed deposits with the Scheduled Commercial Bank  (SCBs).  The bank group-wise details are as under:-
 
Bank Group
Total No. of Accounts
Total Unclaimed Deposit (Rs.In Crores)
SBI Group
10,95,278
2,33.91
Public Sector Banks
86,83,866
19,44.52
Private Sector Banks
14,24,093
2,33.56
Foreign Banks
46,607
69.41
Total (SCBs)
1,12,49,844
24,81.40
 
RBI vide its circular dated August 22, 2008 and July 01, 2011 directed the banks to play a more proactive role in finding the whereabouts of the account holders, whose accounts have remained inoperative and has provided detailed guidelines to the banks dealing with inoperative accounts.  These circulars are available on the RBI website www.rbi.org.in.  Banks have been advised to make an annual review of accounts in which there are no operations for more than one year.  Banks have been advised to consider launching a special drive for finding the whereabouts of the customers/legal heirs in respect of existing account which have already transferred to the separate ledger of “Inoperative Accounts”.  These instructions, inter-alia, include operations in such accounts to be allowed after due-diligence and no charge to be levied for activation of
inoperative accounts.
 
RBI has, vide their circular dated 7th February, 2012 adivsed the banks to display the list of unclaimed deposits/inoperative accounts which are inactive/inoperative for ten years or more on their respective website.  The list so displayed on the websites must contain only the names of account holder(s) and his/her address in respect of unclaimed deposit/inoperative accounts.  Banks   have been advised to give on the same website, the information on the process of claiming the unclaimed deposit/activating the inoperative account and the necessary forms and documents for claiming the same.  The hanks have been advised to complete this process by June 30, 2012 and keep their websites updated at regular intervals.  Banks have been advised to have adequate operational safe-guards to ensure that the claimants are genuine.
 
This information was given by the Minister of State for Finance, Shri   Namo Narain     Meena in written reply to a question in Lok  Sabha today.
 
SS/Hb
 
(Release ID :82014)

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Vacancy for CA in JP Morgan Chase

Job Description 

Analyst – IB EMEA LEC, IB Finance, Global Finance, Bangalore.-120020998

Job Description

 
JPMorgan Chase & Co is a global financial services powerhouse with assets of US$1.3 trillion and operations in more than 50 countries. The firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers, small business and commercial banking, financial transaction processing, asset and wealth management, and private equity. In Australia, JPMorgan is one of the few fully integrated investment banks with leadership positions across mergers and acquisitions, debt capital markets, derivatives, equities, equity capital markets, and treasury and securities services.

If you're interested in working in an environment where you can aspire to be the best, execute superbly and be part of a great team and winning culture, then explore the opportunities at JPMorgan.

Revised fees of Bank Audit 2011-2012 & increase in time line to complte the audit to 21 April at branch level

There are increase in audit fees & also increase in time line to complte the audit to 21 April at branch level
 
Please do the Quality audit & provided the maximum observation and MOC
 
 
Category of bank branch
Rates of audit fees  Revised Rates of audit fees 
(on the basis of quantum of advances) (Rs.) New Fees
Upto Rs.75 lakh 12,500/-                                   15,625
Above Rs.75 lakh and upto Rs.150 lakh 15,000/-                                   18,750
Above Rs.150 lakh and upto Rs.300 lakh 22,500/-                                   28,125
Above Rs.3 crore and upto Rs.5 crore 30,000/-                                   37,500
Above Rs.5 crore and upto Rs.10 crore 35,000/-                                   43,750
Above Rs.10 crore and upto Rs.20 crore 50,000/-                                   62,500
Above Rs.20 crore and upto Rs.30 crore 69,000/-                                   86,250
Above Rs.30 crore and upto Rs.50 crore 1,05,000/-                                 131,250
Above Rs.50 crore and upto Rs.75 crore 1,20,000/-                                 150,000
Above Rs.75 crore and upto Rs.125 crore 1,59,000/-                                 198,750
Above Rs.125 crore and upto Rs.175 crore 1,99,000/-                                 248,750
Above Rs.175 crore and upto Rs.300 crore 2,50,000/-                                 312,500
Above Rs.300 crore and upto Rs.500 crore 2,82,000/-                                 352,500
Above Rs.500 crore 3,13,000                                 391,250
__._,_.___

Budget 2012: Applicable Rate of Service Tax

Budget 2012: Applicable Rate of Service Tax
Union Budget 2012, announced on March 16, 2012, has proposed a sizable quantum of amendments for the service industry. The entire regime of taxation has been proposed to be shifted from ‘positive list' to ‘negative list' (with effect from such date as the Central Government may, by notification, appoint). However, the major challenge, currently, faced by the industry is on account of the change in the rate of service tax from 10% to 12% with effect from April 1, 2012. The change in rate, coupled with certain legislative changes regarding the determination of applicable rate, point of taxation, date of payment, has created a lot of confusion among the service providers, regarding the rate at which service tax should be charged on, in different scenarios, like:

+ Contracts being entered into during the current period that is prior to April 1, 2012, for services to be provided/ consideration to be received subsequent to April 1, 2012, or

+ Contracts for services to be provided prior to April 1, 2012 where the payment would be received subsequent to April 1, 2012, or

+ Continuing contracts executed prior to April 1, 2012

and also the mechanism for discharge of service tax liability.

In relation to the period prior to April 1, 2011, the provisions relating to determination of rate of tax applicable on a service transaction were absent from the Service Tax Laws. Accordingly, the practice adopted by the service industry was to charge service tax at the rate in force during the period when the service was provided. This practice found support from the judicial pronouncements issued in relation to the relevant period. There were, however, disputes in relation to determination of the date of provision of service, in particular, in the case of continuing services, where the invoicing is done on a periodical basis.

The Finance Act 2011, vide Notification No. 3/2011 dated April 1, 2011 introduced Rule 5B in the Service Tax Rules, 1994, which provided that the rate of tax applicable on a transaction shall be "the rate prevailing at the time when the services are deemed to have been provided under the rules made in this regard". Accordingly, the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 (‘the POT Rules'), were introduced stipulating ‘when a service would be deemed to have been provided' (termed as ‘point of taxation' in terms of the POT Rules). In terms of the POT Rules, in case of a change in the effective rate of tax, the point of taxation and the corresponding applicable rate could be determined in two different scenarios, as follows:

Scenario 1: Taxable services are provided before the change in effective rate of tax, i.e. April 1, 2012:
Situation
Date of Issuance of Invoice
Date of Payment
Point of Taxation
Applicable Rate
A
April 6
April 1
April 1
New Rate (12%)
B
March 15
April 15
March 15
Old Rate (10%)
C
April 15
March 15
March 15
Old Rate (10%)

Scenario 2: Taxable services are provided after the change in effective rate of tax, i.e. April 1, 2012:
Situation
Date of Issuance of Invoice
Date of Payment
Point of taxation
Applicable Rate
A
March 20
March 31
March 20
Old Rate (10%)
B
March 15
April 15
April 15
New Rate (12%)
C
April 15
March 15
April 15
New Rate (12%)

The above tables could be summarized for each of the situations as follows:

+ If the service has been provided prior to the date of change in rate, then, the new rate would be applicable only in the situation when both the date of issuance of invoice as well as the date of payment is subsequent to the date of change in rate.

+ If the service has not been provided prior to the date of change in rate, then, the old rate would be applicable only in the situation when both the date of issuance of invoice as well as the date of payment is prior to the date of change in rate.
Further, Situation B under Scenario 2 gives rise to a practical challenge, wherein the invoice, when issued prior to April 1, 2012, would reflect the rate of 10%. However, the point of taxation would be April 15, 2012, when the payment is received. Consequently, the service tax liability would be required to be discharged at the rate of 12% as liability for the month of April 2012. The service providers, in such a scenario, would be required to issue a supplementary invoice for differential service tax at the rate of 2% in the month of April 2012.

Position after the Union Budget 2012:

A complexity has arisen by virtue of an amendment to the POT Rules, by insertion of Rule 2A w.e.f. April 1, 2012 (vide Notification No. 4/2012 dated March 17, 2012), which stipulates what constitutes the ‘date of payment'.
Summary of the propositions of Rule 2A:

Generally, the date of payment would be the earlier of the date on which the payment is entered in the books of accounts or is credited to the bank account of the service provider. However, in case where,

+ the service provider receives the payment for services by way of an instrument like cheque, demand draft etc.,

+ records the payment in the books of accounts prior to the change in rate of tax (viz. by March 31, 2012), and

+ the amount is credited in his bank account after four working days of change in rate of tax (viz. after April 5, 2012),
then, the ‘date of payment' shall be the date of credit of amount in the bank account, instead of the date of recording the payment in the books of accounts.

Accordingly, the position which emerges in relation to the increase in rate, from 10% to 12%, w.e.f. April 1, 2012 is as follows:

+ If the service has been provided prior to April 1, 2012, then, the rate of 10% would be applicable when either of the date of issuance of invoice or date of payment (or both) is prior to April 1, 2012. In the latter case (viz. date of payment prior to April 1, 2012 and date of issuance of invoice on or after April 1, 2012), it must be ensured that where the payment is recorded in the books of accounts (of the service provider) on receipt of the cheque/ demand draft upto March 31, 2012, the same should be credited in the bank account by April 5, 2012. In all the other cases, tax rate of 12% would be applicable

+ If the service has not been provided prior to April 1, 2012, then, the rate of 10% would be applicable only in the situation when both the date of issuance of invoice as well as the date of payment is prior to the date of change in rate. Again, it should be ensured that where the payment is recorded in the books of accounts (of the service provider) on receipt of the cheque/ demand draft upto March 31, 2012, the same should be credited in the bank account upto April 5, 2012. In all the other cases, tax rate of 12% would be applicable.

+ Further, where the invoice has been raised charging service tax @ 10% in relation to the services to be provided after April 1, 2012 and the payment has not been received till March 31, 2012 (or April 5, 2012 in specific scenario covered by Rule 2A of the POT Rules), then the service provider would be required to issue a supplementary invoice charging the differential service tax @ 2% during the month in which the payment is received.

With simultaneously proposed amendments, such as the insertion of Section 67A in the Finance Act, 1994, and the deletion of Rule 5B of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the interpretation issues are on the upswing. Accordingly, the assessees would be required to monitor not only the contracts/ agreements but also the invoices/ payments/ receipts, till suitable clarifications are issued by the department.

Source:TIOL

RBI guidelines on autonomy to banks for appointment of auditors

For information to all effected parties:

guidelines on autonomy to banks for appointment of auditors from RBI site 

The important part is reproduced here

vi) For the year 2010-11 and onwards –  PSBs will obtain the names of eligible audit firms directly from the Office of C&AG and appoint the SCAs with the prior approval of RBI.

vii) The practice of appointing one Statutory audit firm (SCA / SBA) to one PSB to continue.

viii) PSBs will select suitable SCAs from the list provided by RBI / C&AG – as the case may be, and after obtaining the consent of the audit firms in writing for consideration of appointment as SCAs, would recommend their names to RBI with the approval of the respective ACB / Board of Directors before actual appointment.

ix) Banks to clearly advise the audit firms selected for consideration of appointment that one audit firm an take up audit assignment (SCA / SBA) in one PSB only and should obtain their consent in writing for consideration of appointment as SCA or SBA of the bank concerned for the particular year before recommending their names to RBI.  The consent given by an audit firm will be treated asirrevocable.
x) The existing tenure of 3 years of continuous statutory central audit (existing SCAs appointed prior to 2006-07 will complete a tenure of 4 years) to continue with compulsory rest of at least 2 years.

II. Statutory Branch Auditors 
(a) Norms
The existing minimum eligibility / empanelment / categorization, etc. norms including those for deficit / surplus areas to continue as of now.
(b)  SBAs for large PSBs
The large PSBs having balance sheet size (assets + liabilities) of above Rs. 1 lac crore each to exercise managerial autonomy in regard to appointment of SBAs also from the year 2008-09 onwards.  Thus, State Bank of India, Allahabad Bank, Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, Central Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Syndicate Bank, Punjab National Bank, UCO Bank and Union Bank of India would be required to select / appoint their SBAs from the year 2009-10, and Central Bank of India, Union Bank of India and Bank of Baroda have indicated their unwillingness to select their SBAs, all these banks would also be encouraged to select their SBAs  from this year itself.
As SBI Act mandates appointment of statutory auditors by RBI in consultation with Central Government, SBI would select their SCAs /SBAs   for appointment by RBI in accordance with the statutory provisions.
(c )  SBAs for remaining PSBs
For the remaining PSBs, the existing practice of RBI providing the list of audit firms to be appointed as SBAs would continue during the years 2008-09 and 2009-10.  During these two years, these banks would put in place an effective system of selection / appointment of SBAs on their own from the year 2010-11.
II. General Norms applicable both for SBAs and SCAs.
(i) In respect of the banks identified above, RBI to provide the list of eligible auditors / audit firms.  The existing categorisation norms for empanelment of SBAs to continues.

(ii) The banks, stated above, to select suitable auditors / audit firms as SBAs in such a manner as to enlist the required number of branch auditors to carry out the statutory audit of branches during the relevant year.

(iii) The existing tenure of 4 years of continuous statutory branch audit (existing SBAs appointed prior to 2006-07 will complete a tenure of 5 years) to continue, after which they are to be rotated / rested in 33 identified centres.

(iv) The concept of one audit firm for one PSB to continue.  The consent given by an audit firm will be treated as irrevocable.

(v) SBAs to be selected for appointment to audit branches located in the centres in which their offices are situated or branches located in centres which are in close proximity to their offices.

(vi) Banks to have a suitable mix of various categories of auditors / audit firms while selecting the SBAs keeping in view the size of the branches to be audited. The same auditors / audit firms cannot audit the same bank for a continuous period exceeding 4 years.

(vii) Banks should carry out branch audit in such a way that SCAs should audit the top 20 branches (to be selected strictly in order of the level of outstanding advances as at the end of March 31 of the previous year) to cover a minimum of 15% of total gross advances of the bank by SCAs.
--
CA. Mukesh Saran

APPOINTMENT OF QCR RATED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FIRMS AS STATUTORY AUDITORS FOR ECONOMICALLY SIGNIFICANT COMPANIES

CA/QAD/Circular-01/2012                                                                                                                                                                  March 29, 2012

ALL MEMBERS OF THE INSTITUTE
 
APPOINTMENT OF QCR RATED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FIRMS AS STATUTORY AUDITORS FOR ECONOMICALLY SIGNIFICANT COMPANIES
 
Dear Member,
 
In 2002 the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) issued Code of Corporate Governance and introduced the following requirement in the listing regulations of the stock exchanges with regard to QCR:
 
“No listed company shall appoint as external auditors a firm of auditors which has not been given a satisfactory rating under the Quality Control Review Programme of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan.”
 
The scope of QCR Programme has been further extended by SECP vide its SRO 268(I)/2012 dated March 16, 2012 (copy enclosed). Now all non-listed companies, falling under the definition of ‘Economically Significant Companies’  (ESC) would also be required to appoint QCR rated firms as their statutory external auditors. The requirement of this directive shall be effective from the financial year beginning on or after July 01, 2012.
 
ESC has been defined in the Fifth Schedule to the Companies Ordinance, 1984 as follows:
 
“Economically significant company means a company which has:
 
(a)    turnover in excess of Rs. 1 billion, excluding other income;
 
(b)   number of employees in excess of 750;
 
(c)   total borrowings (excluding trade creditors and accrued liabilities) in excess of Rs. 500 million:
 
Provided that in order to be treated as economically significant any two of the criterion mentioned in (a), (b) and (c) above have to be met. The criteria followed will be based on the previous year’s audited financial statements. Companies can be excluded from this category where they do not fall under the aforementioned criteria for two consecutive years.”
 
All those firms whose names are not in the "List of Satisfactory QCR Ratings" and would like to carry out audit of ESC after July 01, 2012 are advised to offer themselves for QCR in order to be eligible for the appointment of the ESC.
 
 
 
Shahid Hussain, FCA
Director Quality Assurance

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
For mobile version of this site click here


News Archive